| Current
Contents » Information
Cell » Information Manuals »
Decision Making Process : |
| Decision
making process |
The Institute follows three tiers of decision making process with
the ultimate authority vested in the Director who is the CEO of
the Institute. The Institute mainly caters to external Industry
sponsored research and R&D projects of the Government of India.
The procedure followed in taking up external research work, be
it Industry sponsored or S&T projects of Government of In-house
Research Projects, is as per ISO norm defined in the operations
manual (SOP). This is summarised in two parts - Part-A and Part-B.
As regards Establishment (R&P and Service
rules), Administrative (day to day requirement) and financial
decisions (receipts and payments), the Institute follows its own
set of rules as approved by its Governing Body from time to time.
However, wherever these rules are not explicitly defined in the
Governing Body decisions, standard central government rules as
per FR & SR are followed (Part-C).
|
PART-A : For taking
up Sponsored Projects
|
| Stage-1 |
Receipt
of proposal
cum Work-request |
All
proposal from clients are received in Director's office and then
as per the area of work, this is marked to respective divisional
heads for comments on feasible of execution of job/ work and the
likely cost involved. |
| Similarly
tender enquiries for classified jobs are marked to respective HODs
or discipline leaders, as per their area(s) of work by the Director. |
| Stage-2 |
Formulation and
approval of the techno-commercial offer
|
The
HODs formulate the project proposal cum cost-estimate based on the
expected level of manpower involved, intellectual input and other
infrastructure facilities involved and submit the same to Director. |
|
For jobs under tender-process, where no external conditions can
be applied, the net cost involved is submitted by the respective
department (through HOD) to DTO for approval. No technical formulation
is involved in this case. |
| The
technical cum Comerica proposal (or the commercial one in case of
tender) is vetted by the Technical Services Division. If found in
order, this is put up for Director's approval, else this is referred
back to respective division for clarification/ comments and necessary
modifications. |
| Stage-3 |
Communication
to Client and Registration of Work-order
|
Once updated
proposal is approved by the Director, the HOD is informed of the same
by the TSD. The client in turn too is informed of cost and terms and
conditions of the work execution as per approved norm of the Institute.
Normally communication to client is done by the TSD but in some cases,
respective HOD or Project Leader too communicates the same directly
to the client with Director's approval. |
| Once
the clients accepts the proposal and communicates the same with
advance payment as per terms of techno-commercial offer, the work-order
is registered by the TSD and the work commences as per schedule
drawn out by the respective Project Leader in mutual consultation
with the client.
In exceptional cases, for Government clients, the work order is
registered even without payment provided an MOU is signed to that
effect on terms of work schedule and payment. |
| |
| PART-B
: S&T and In-house Projects |
S
& T Projects
and
In-house research Projects |
Formulation |
For S&T projects, respective
divisions draw out the project proposal themselves and submit the
same to Director for perusal and necessary approval. Similar procedure
is followed for In-house research projects. |
Evaluation/
Review/ Submission |
Once the proposal is approved
by the Director, it is submitted to the proper forum after review
by the Peer Review Committee. Comments/ suggestions of the PRC are
incorporated in the Project Proposal, that is finally forwarded to
the respective nodal agency of the government. |
Acceptance &
Registration
|
Whenever called, the project
proposal is defended by the Director or the assigned project leader
at the appropriate forum. Finally if the approval of project proposal
is received, the project is registered and work commences as per schedule
of work in the proposal.
In-house research project is registered after approval of the updated
proposal by the Director and work is taken up immediately. |
| |
| PART
- C : Establishment/ Administrative/ Financial Decisions |
| Establishment |
|
The sanctioned
strength of the Institute at KGF is 80 excluding Director. This can
be enhanced or curtailed by the Governing Body. The number of posts
in different groups and grades are defined but they can be changed
by the Governing Body.
|
Recruitment and Promotion
rules
|
As
per present recruitment policy of the Institute appointments to
all posts are made on contract for a period of five years,
whereafter the services of the employee may be regularised or contract
may be renewed as per recommendations of the Contract Review Committee (CRC) based on
the performance evaluation of the individual employee. |
| |
The
Institute has its own service rules, copy of which is available
in the Institute's library. All employees are entitled for CL(8days),
El(30 days) and SL(15 days) in a year plus perks like CPF, Gratuity,
Medical reimbursement and other benefits as defined in the service
rules. |
Administration |
Service
matters |
As regards
service matters, all administrative decisions are made within the
approved service rules of the Institute, which also incorporates
the CDA rules. Administrative decisions are normally endorsed or
proposed by the Head of Administration and are effective after approval
of the Director. |
| |
Other
matters |
Other
than the service matters, separate rules are not explicitly framed
in all the areas for the Institute. Hence the Institute follows
the norms defined in the FRSR, wherever the well-defined rule is
not prescribed or approved by the GB. The extent of power vested
in Director for taking administrative decisions are defined in the
powers to Director. |
Finance |
Purchase
related |
The Institute
has well-defined purchase rules which is implemented by the designated committees. The decision of the Director is final on all
procurement up to Rs.20.00 lacs beyond which the matter is referred
to the Governing Body for approval. Opinion of Head of Finance is
followed/honoured in all transactions. |
Employee
related |
All
financial transactions pertaining to employees are governed as per
the approved service rules wherever defined like TA/DA, medical
and gratuity. In other areas, standard rules applicable to central
government employees are followed. |
Institute
related |
The Institute is partially
funded by Government and for remaining expenses, it has to generate
its own revenue. The Governing Body approves the budget for Institute.
The Director has well-defined powers for re-appropriation of plan
funds and to meet urgent revenue as well as capital expenses out
of Institute's earnings. |
Project
related |
Since, all sponsored projects comprise mainly a contractual
agreement between the Client (Sponsorer) and the Institute, its timely
and proper implementation/ completion is essential. Director of the
Institute is wide-ranging power on all project related matters, be
it ad-hoc recruitment, purchase or tour or any other contingent expenditure.
All such requirements are put up by the respective implementing department
or Project Leader and is approved by Director after due vetting by
the Finance, Administration or Technical Services, as the case may
be. |
| |
|
|
The decision making processes defined above are broad-based but
not comprehensive. For subject specific process, details can be
obtained on written request from the Head of Office or the PIO.
|
(c)
2005, NIRM, KGF |